Talk:Portmanager
From FreeBSDwiki
(Difference between revisions)
Ninereasons (Talk | contribs) (→Configuration) |
Ninereasons (Talk | contribs) (→Configuration) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Configuration== | ==Configuration== | ||
| − | It would be nice to have a section on configuration and installation of this port. What does the configuration option do: "BUILD_DEPENDS_ARE_LEAVES - Treat build dependencies as leaves" ? [[User:Ninereasons|Ninereasons]] 12:56, 14 April 2006 (EDT) | + | It would be nice to have a section on configuration and installation of this port. What does the configuration option do: "BUILD_DEPENDS_ARE_LEAVES - Treat build dependencies as leaves" ? |
| + | |||
| + | I'd also like to see better reasons given for the favorable comparison. The blanket statement that portmanager is better than portupgrade is not well illustrated by the link to a description of a common error that shows up when you use '-a' instead of '-ra' or '-raR'. For another example, is it really "better" (rather than "simpler") that this tool automatically uninstalls ports that have been deleted from the port tree? [[User:Ninereasons|Ninereasons]] 12:56, 14 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:03, 14 April 2006
[edit] Configuration
It would be nice to have a section on configuration and installation of this port. What does the configuration option do: "BUILD_DEPENDS_ARE_LEAVES - Treat build dependencies as leaves" ?
I'd also like to see better reasons given for the favorable comparison. The blanket statement that portmanager is better than portupgrade is not well illustrated by the link to a description of a common error that shows up when you use '-a' instead of '-ra' or '-raR'. For another example, is it really "better" (rather than "simpler") that this tool automatically uninstalls ports that have been deleted from the port tree? Ninereasons 12:56, 14 April 2006 (EDT)
