pavement

Talk:RAID, performance tests

From FreeBSDwiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(karen millen outlet: new section)
Line 100: Line 100:
  
 
== /end raw info ==
 
== /end raw info ==
 
== cheap burberry handbags ==
 
 
thanks you for sharing       
 
<a href=http://www.burberryoutlet2012.co.uk/> cheap burberry bags</a>
 
 
== discount moncler jackets ==
 
 
Moncler has had the honor of getting chosen for designing apparel for the French Olympics team and their lightweight collection specially designed for the French skiing team has been the stepping stone for Women?¡¥s Moncler Jackets inside the industry proper now. At present Moncler is quickly amongst by far one of the most sought soon soon after premium luxury brand for outdoor and sport jackets. Adrienne Ma has introduced Moncler to China lately and also the inaugural shop was opened in Hong Kong.Moncler jackets for ladies had been a total sale-out inside days of the inaugural.
 
 
Make your winters fashionable by introducing moncker down vest to your winter collection. Endorsed by fairly several celebrities, Moncler is normally a brand that has maintained its foothold within the fluctuating fashion market for years now and promises to continue performing so within the future too.
 
 
You will need to make an informed decision when purchasing a nice Moncler females ski jacket, and by taking fabric and styling into consideration, these jackets are definitely your ideal selection.Of course, for many people, shopping in a retail shop or going to a sale nonetheless be their first selection. Performing some research prior to you going to a sale is really needed. Internet may be the greatest tool to complete that. Just log onto your preferred search engine and search your favorite Moncler jacket.
 
 
These are often  <a href=http://www.monclermalls.com/moncler-shoes-c-8.html>Moncler Shoes sale</a>
 
  inside the USA, Australia, UK along with other European countries. Ladies who already have 1 or much more Moncler jacket will know how charming you'll grow to be when you weaing them. Moncler often make clothes that look much better on their buyers than on their models, and how typically do we say that about a designer? A woman with hips, boobs, a butt, and also a bit of a tummy can pull these jackets off significantly much better.
 
 
moncker jackets outlet has added raw signifies moved to Grenoble. Moncler in 1964, arranged up using the sponsor Terray branch in Alaska. Moncler in 1968, grew to be participate operating with the Grenoble Winter fixture titles and held its tenth standard French nationwide ski celebration supporters.
 
 
== karen millen outlet ==
 
 
I am looking forward to another great article from you.           
 
<a href=http://www.karenmillendressesoutlets.com>karen millen outlet</a> 
 
 
 
<a href=http://www.karenmillendressesoutlets.com>karen millen outlet</a>
 

Revision as of 20:41, 27 October 2011

raw info temporarily moved from main article page here

Equipment:

Athlon X2 5000+ 
    3x Western Digital 250GB drives (WDC WD2500JS-22NCB1 10.02E02 SATA-300)
    2x Western Digital 500GB drives (WDC WD5000AAKS-00YGA0 12.01C02)
    Nvidia nForce onboard RAID controller, Promise TX2300 RAID controller
Athlon 64 3500+ 
    5x Seagate 750GB drives (Seagate ST3750640NS 3.AEE SATA-150)
    Nvidia nForce onboard RAID controller

Procedure:

/usr/bin/time -h measuring simultaneous cp of 3.1GB files to /dev/null
    files generated with dd if=/dev/random bs=16M count=200
    simultaneous cp processes use physically separate files
write performance tested with dd if/dev/zero bs=16M count=200
sysctl -w vfs.read_max=128 unless otherwise stated

Notes:

system default of vfs.read_max=8
bonnie++ was flirted with, but couldn't figure out how to make it read 
  big enough chunks of data to ever once hit the disk instead of the cache!

Ancillary data:

write performance (1 process)
5 250GB/500GB, graid3               : 153 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, graid3 -r            : 142 MB/s
1 500GB drive                       :  72 MB/s
1 WD Raptor 74GB drive (Cygwin)     :  60 MB/s
1 250GB drive                       :  58 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror round-robin  :  49 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror split 128k   :  49 MB/s
1 process
5 250GB/500GB, graid3               : 213 MB/s (dips down to 160MB/sec)
5 750GB disks, graid3               : 152 MB/s (wildly fluctuating 120MB/s-200MB/s)
3 250GB disks, graid3               : 114 MB/s (dips down to 90MB/sec)
1 500GB disk                        :  76 MB/s
1 750GB disk                        :  65 MB/s (60MB/s-70MB/s)
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror round-robin  :  63 MB/s
3 250GB disks, gmirror round-robin  :  59 MB/s
1 250GB disk                        :  56 MB/s (very little variation)
3 250GB disks, gmirror split 128K   :  55 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror split 128K   :  54 MB/s
2 processes
5 250GB/500GB, graid3               : 128 MB/s (peak: 155+ MB/sec)
5 750GB disks, graid3               : 125 MB/s (peak: 140+ MB/sec)
3 250GB disks, graid3               :  98 MB/s (peak: 130+ MB/sec)
3 250GB disks, graid3 -r            :  88 MB/s (peak: 120+ MB/sec)
2 250GB disks, nVidia onboard RAID1 :  81 MB/s (peak: 120+ MB/sec) // initial test had flawed data - retested for final article
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror round-robin  :  73 MB/s
2 250GB disks, Promise TX2300 RAID1 :  70 MB/s (peak: 100+ MB/sec) // initial test had flawed data - retested for final article
1 500GB disk                        :  70 MB/s
1 250GB disk                        :  56 MB/s (peak: 60+ MB/sec)
2 250GB disks, gmirror round-robin  :  55 MB/s (peak: 65+ MB/sec)
3 250GB disks, gmirror round-robin  :  53 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror split 128K   :  50 MB/s
3 250GB disks, gmirror split 128K   :  46 MB/s
3 processes 
5 250GB/500GB, graid3               : 106 MB/s (peak: 130+ MB/sec low: 90+ MB/sec)
5 250GB/500GB, graid3 -r            : 103 MB/s (peak: 120+ MB/sec low: 80+ MB/sec)
1 500GB disk                        :  72 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror round-robin  :  69 MB/s
1 250GB disk                        :  55 MB/s
3 250GB disks, gmirror round-robin  :  53 MB/s
3 250GB disks, gmirror split 128K   :  49 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror split 128K   :  47 MB/s
4 processes
5 250GB/500GB, graid3               : 105 MB/s (peak: 130+ MB/sec low: 90+ MB/sec)
5 250GB/500GB, graid3 -r            : 105 MB/s (peak: 120+ MB/sec low: 80+ MB/sec)
1 500GB disk                        :  72 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror round-robin  :  71 MB/s (peak:  75+ MB/sec low: 64+ MB/sec)
3 250GB disks, gmirror round-robin  :  65 MB/s
1 250GB disk                        :  55 MB/s
3 250GB disks, gmirror split 128K   :  55 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror split 128K   :  47 MB/s (peak:  59+ MB/sec low: 31+ MB/sec)
5 processes
5 250GB/500GB, graid3 -r            : 107 MB/s (peak: 120+ MB/sec low: 80+ MB/sec) 
5 250GB/500GB, graid3               : 105 MB/s (peak: 130+ MB/sec low: 90+ MB/sec)
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror round-robin  :  72 MB/s (peak:  80+ MB/sec low: 67+ MB/sec)
1 500GB disk                        :  72 MB/s
1 250GB disk                        :  56 MB/s
5 250GB/500GB, gmirror split 128K   :  47 MB/s (peak: 60+ MB/sec low: 35+ MB/sec)
vfs.read_max=8, 2 parallel cp processes
3 250GB disks, gmirror round-robin : 31 MB/s
1 250GB disk                       : 27 MB/s
2 250GB disks, gmirror round-robin : 23 MB/s

Preliminary conclusions:

system default of vfs.read_max=8 is insufficient for ANY configuration, including vanilla single-drive
gmirror read performance sucks - Promise read performance sucks - nvidia read performance sucks for single-process
graid3 is the clear performance king here and offers very significant write performance increase as well
SATA-II seems to offer significant performance increases over SATA-I on large arrays

/end raw info

Personal tools