pavement

Securing servers

From FreeBSDwiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Security in a local user context)
(Security in a local user context)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
You can also disallow logins from non-local consoles, or logins that are not from a specific domain or IP by editing the very well commented /etc/login.access file.
 
You can also disallow logins from non-local consoles, or logins that are not from a specific domain or IP by editing the very well commented /etc/login.access file.
  
Another way to disallow logins -- let's say you have a user that left, and you don't want to keep their account open because it's a potential hole (or you don't trust them,) but you don't want to delete the account or it's files just yet. Go to /etc/master.passwd and change their password -- the second field, right after their username: field -- and delete it, replacing it with "*". Since no password hash will ever match "*", they'll never be able to login authenticating against the password. Since we're going to be blocking the user, we might as well run [[chsh]] and change their shell from a valid login shell to something that you can't login with, like /bin/false.
+
Another way to disallow logins -- let's say you have a user that left, and you don't want to keep their account open because it's a potential hole (or you don't trust them,) but you don't want to delete the account or it's files just yet. Go to /etc/master.passwd and change their password -- the second field, right after their username: field -- and delete it, replacing it with "*". Since no password hash will ever match "*", they'll never be able to login authenticating against the password. Since we're going to be blocking the user, we might as well run [[chsh]] and change their shell from a valid login shell to something that you can't login with, like /bin/false. Note that this will break some programs -- tftp will not let you connect if you don't have a valid login shell, for example.
  
  

Revision as of 13:55, 30 September 2004

Eventually we'll need sections or subarticles on various different security contexts:

Contents

First Impressions Are Everything

Login banners are useful sometimes, but since you'll likely already know what system you're logging into and what you're going to be using it for, will probably be unnecessary, and any extraneous information that they give when you login will usually be worthless to you but potentially useful to an attacker. If you want to change it (or remove it,) you'll need to:

1. edit /etc/motd (make it blank or put in a warning like "you're being logged" or "authorized access ONLY" or something
2. touch /etc/COPYRIGHT and
3. add update_motd="NO" to /etc/rc.conf.
4. reboot to verify that the changes are made and effective.

Security in a local user context

If your system has multiple users that have access to the box, you might want to restrict who can log on locally as well as over the network.

First, let's block anyone from logging into the machine as root -- make users log in with a regular account and then su to root if they want root access. Edit /etc/ttys and replace all the values marked "secure" with "insecure" in the tty sections. You can do this with sed if you like, but be very careful with this file, as if you mistype something, you'll break logins. Consider making a backup of it, using something like this:

samizdata# sed s/secure/insecure/ /etc/ttys > /etc/ttys_new
samizdata# mv /etc/ttys /etc/ttys.bak && mv /etc/ttys_new /etc/ttys

You can also disallow logins from non-local consoles, or logins that are not from a specific domain or IP by editing the very well commented /etc/login.access file.

Another way to disallow logins -- let's say you have a user that left, and you don't want to keep their account open because it's a potential hole (or you don't trust them,) but you don't want to delete the account or it's files just yet. Go to /etc/master.passwd and change their password -- the second field, right after their username: field -- and delete it, replacing it with "*". Since no password hash will ever match "*", they'll never be able to login authenticating against the password. Since we're going to be blocking the user, we might as well run chsh and change their shell from a valid login shell to something that you can't login with, like /bin/false. Note that this will break some programs -- tftp will not let you connect if you don't have a valid login shell, for example.


things needed here:(cover common gotchas and SNAFUs concerning local security; ie preventing valid shell users from obtaining privileges they aren't supposed to have or doing damage they shouldn't be able to do. sudo is clearly a must with this one, as is some discussion of running daemons under special user accounts, and the dangers of overusing "nobody" to run daemons. a quick rundown of system files that permissions should be double-checked on, like /etc/passwd, /etc/master.passwd, /etc/group, and the databases associated with them should also be covered.)

Security in an internet context

what's listening? We'll want to know what ports are open and listening. If you didn't follow the installation instructions and installed IPv6 support when you installed the system (like me), you'll want to check for IPv6 sockets as well as IPv4; become root and run sockstat with -46 as an argument; this will let you know the socket status for both IPv4 and IPv6 sockets (in this context, a socket = port + protocol). For more details, see the sockstat entry's section on security. Any services that don't 'need' to be running should be disabled or uninstalled completely, if possible.

who's connecting? Consider allowing only specific machines to connect to your system at all, or trusted networks only. Make changes in your hosts.allow and hosts.deny files as appropriate. Consider securing what users can log in at all by altering which shells they can use -- see chsh for how to do this.

Authentication, Encryption and You

FreeBSD encrypts passwords. Unfortunately, it doesn't do it the strongest way possible by default. The reason being that stronger encryption takes more effort to perform and can sometimes be slow. But if you're serious about making your machine harder to crack, you'll want to switch your password encryption from md5 to the blowfish algorithm. Blowfish has the benefit of being both fast and strong (military-grade strong.) This is a 4-step process. 1. edit /etc/login.conf and change the passwd_format entry to

:passwd_format=blf:\

2. rebuild the login.conf database with

samizdata# cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf

3. change all your user's passwords (or get them to change 'em by expiring their passwords) by running passwd for everyone (INCLUDING ROOT):

samizdata# passwd 

4. you'll want to change the configuration file that the adduser program calls to use blowfish automagically. Do this by changing the crypt_default=md5 line in /etc/auth.conf to crypt_default=blf so that any new accounts you make on the system use it from the get-go.


Security in a local area network context

(probably the shortest of the categories - specific things to watch for in an un-firewalled and extremely-high-bandwidth mostly-trusted environment.)

Security through better logging

(keeping time up to date with ntpd or regularly scheduled ntpdate - and it's worth noting that I've NEVER personally been able to get ntpd to actually update the damn system time, all it seems to do is maintain a drift file for me - but anyway, importance of keeping system time precise down to milliseconds for coordination of system logs with logs at ISPs and other servers involved in network attacks, use of tripwire or built-in daily root emails to monitor for changes in important system files, and also the benefits of either maintaining a separate log server or REGULARLY moving logs off-system to a machine that doesn't trust the server it's getting the logs from one damn bit. this topic may actually need to be moved to its own separate subarticle.)






Of course, each of these sections can themselves spawn entire new subsections / subarticles of their own. There's a reason entire books have been published on computer security! =)

Try to remember, when writing these articles, that "short and sweet" is best, when it comes to a single article. If at all possible, try to limit the scope of any given article to a page or two of text; if you need to refer to something that is going to run a few pages all by itself, consider writing a separate article for that topic and hyperlinking it for people who need it. For example, obviously firewalls need discussion in any internet-context security article, but instead of trying to go over setting one up in the midst of the internet security article itself, it's better to write one article about firewalls and another about the big picture, and just link them.

Personal tools