Category talk:Why FreeBSD?
From FreeBSDwiki
(Difference between revisions)
(makes sense to me) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
how about compile them up into an article, and if it looks good we'll nuke the category and just link the article in its place. --[[User:65.4.111.50|65.4.111.50]] 17:16, 10 Sep 2005 (EDT) | how about compile them up into an article, and if it looks good we'll nuke the category and just link the article in its place. --[[User:65.4.111.50|65.4.111.50]] 17:16, 10 Sep 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | knock yourself out | ||
| + | --[[User:Dave|Dave]] 18:40, 10 Sep 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 10 September 2005
Should not be a category
The "articles" are very very small. "Why FreeBSD?" should not be a separate category, but rather an article.
makes sense to me
how about compile them up into an article, and if it looks good we'll nuke the category and just link the article in its place. --65.4.111.50 17:16, 10 Sep 2005 (EDT)
knock yourself out --Dave 18:40, 10 Sep 2005 (EDT)
