Stability - Revision history

Jimbo: Reverted edits by 68.154.137.85 (Talk); changed back to last version by Jimbo

2008-02-08T00:54:15Z

Reverted edits by 68.154.137.85 (Talk); changed back to last version by Jimbo

2008-02-07T09:17:17Z

2008-02-07T05:16:56Z

2007-05-28T18:41:43Z

2007-01-19T20:30:39Z

2007-01-18T15:13:07Z

qualify that

2004-11-24T21:46:18Z

2004-11-24T20:52:00Z

2004-11-24T20:51:42Z

2004-09-03T06:06:19Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 If you prefer your evidence colloquial, the machine below has been operating as a dedicated, publicly-accessible [[OpenVPN]] server for one of [[User:Jimbo |Jimbo]]'s customers for nearly three continuous years with no downtime.  (Only the fact that it's a laptop has allowed it to rack up such a big uptime - the power company's not nearly as reliable as the OS!)
   $ '''[[uname]] -a'''
    FreeBSD vpn.redacted.tld 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 16 22:16:53 GMT 2003

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability are nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.
 If you prefer your evidence colloquial, the machine below has been operating as a dedicated, publicly-accessible [[OpenVPN]] server for one of [[User:Jimbo |Jimbo]]'s customers for nearly three continuous years with no downtime.  (Only the fact that it's a laptop has allowed it to rack up such a big uptime - the power company's not nearly as reliable as the OS!)
   $ '''[[uname]] -a'''
    FreeBSD vpn.redacted.tld 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 16 22:16:53 GMT 2003

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 7 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	It's like butter!
		+
	One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability are nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.		One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability are nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 28 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability are nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.		One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability are nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.
		+
		+	If you prefer your evidence colloquial, the machine below has been operating as a dedicated, publicly-accessible [[OpenVPN]] server for one of [[User:Jimbo \|Jimbo]]'s customers for nearly three continuous years with no downtime. (Only the fact that it's a laptop has allowed it to rack up such a big uptime - the power company's not nearly as reliable as the OS!)
		+
		+	$ '''[[uname]] -a'''
		+	FreeBSD vpn.redacted.tld 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 16 22:16:53 GMT 2003
		+	$ '''[[uptime]]'''
		+	2:28PM up 1078 days, 5:20, 1 user, load averages: 0.58, 0.35, 0.25
		+
	[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]		[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 19 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability is nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.	+	One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability are nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.
	[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]		[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 18 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~You~~ can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft].	+	One can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft]. Ok, one can (for starters, uptime alone is an unscientific indicator of OS stability), but FreeBSD's rock-solid stability and reliability is nonetheless legendary and widely documented. FreeBSD is the OS behind many of the world's most high traffic websites.
	[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]		[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 24 November 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	You can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft].		You can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft].
	[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]		[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]
−
−	~~http://vnl.no-ip.com~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 You can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft].
 [[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]
-hu

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 24 November 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	You can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft].		You can't argue with [http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html Netcraft].
	[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]		[[Category:Why FreeBSD?]]
		+	hu